Nicolaus Copernicus
Nicolaus Copernicus (in Latin; Polish Mikolaj Kopernik, German
Nikolaus Kopernikus - February 19, 1473 – May 24, 1543) was a Polish
astronomer, mathematician and economist who developed a heliocentric
(Sun-centered) theory of the solar system in a form detailed enough
to make it scientifically useful. He was also a church canon, governor
and administrator, a jurist, astrologer and a doctor. His theory
about the Sun as the center of the solar system, turning over the
traditional geocentric theory (that placed Earth at the center of
the Universe), is considered one of the most important discoveries
ever, and is the fundamental starting point of modern astronomy
and modern science itself (it inaugurated the scientific revolution).
His theory affected many other aspects of human life. Nicolaus Copernicus
University in Torun, established 1945, is named after him.
Biography
Copernicus was born in 1473 in the city of Torun in Royal Prussia,
Poland. His father Nikolas, a citizen of Krakow (at that time the
capital of Poland), moved there in 1460 and became a respected citizen
of Torun as well, once the war with Teutonic Knights was over. He
was ten years of age when his father, a wealthy businessman and
copper trader, died. Little is known of his mother, Barbara Watzenrode,
but she appears to have predeceased her husband. His maternal uncle,
Lucas Watzenrode, a church canon and later the Prince-Bishop governor
of Warmia, raised him and his three other siblings after the death
of Copernicus' father. His brother Andrew became canon in Frombork.
A sister, Barbara, became a Benedictine nun and the other sister,
Katharina, married a businessman and city councillor, Barthel Gertner.
In 1491 Copernicus entered the Jagiellonian University in Krakow,
and here he encountered astronomy for the first time, thanks to
his teacher Albert Brudzewski. This science soon fascinated him,
as his books (stolen by Swedes during The Deluge, and now in Uppsala's
library) show. After four years and a brief stay in Torun, he moved
to Italy, where he studied law and medicine at the universities
of Bologna and Padua. His uncle financed his education and wished
for him to become a bishop as well. However, while studying canon
and civil law at Ferrara, he met his teacher Domenico Maria Novara
da Ferrara, a famous astronomer. He followed his lessons and became
a disciple and assistant.
The first observation Copernicus made in 1497 together with Domenico
Novara, are recorded in De revolutionibus orbium coelestium.
In 1497 his uncle was ordained the bishop of Warmia and Copernicus
was named a canon in the Frombork cathedral, but he waited in Italy
for the great Jubilee of 1500, so he went to Rome, where he could
observe a lunar eclipse and where he gave some lessons of astronomy
or maths (unfortunately nothing of this remains to us).
He would have then visited Frombork only in 1501. As soon as he
reached this town, he asked and obtained permission to return to
Italy to complete his studies in Padua (with Guarico and Fracastoro)
and in Ferrara (with Bianchini), where in 1503 received his doctoral
degree in canon law. It has been supposed that it was in Padua that
he gained access to those passages of Cicero and Plato about the
opinion of Ancients on the movement of the Earth, having the first
intuition of his theory. His collection of observations and ideas
on the theory started in 1504.
Having left Italy at the end of his studies, he came to live and
work in Frombork. Some time before his return to Warmia, he had
received a position at the Collegiate Church of the Holy Cross in
Wroclaw, Silesia, which he held for many years until he resigned
a few years prior to his death, when he progressively became ill.
Throughout his lifetime he made astronomical observations and calculations,
but always in his spare time and never as a profession.
Copernicus worked for years with Prussian diet on monetary reform
and published some studies about the value of money; as a governor
of Warmia, he administered taxes and dealt out justice. It was at
this time that Copernicus came up with one of the earliest iterations
of the theory now known as Gresham's Law. During these years he
also travelled extensively on government business and as a diplomat,
on the behalf of the Prince-Bishop of Warmia.
In 1514 he made his "Commentariolus"—a short, handwritten text
describing his ideas about the heliocentric hypothesis—available
to his friends. From there he continued gathering evidence for a
more detailed work.
During the war between Teutonic Order and Kingdom of Poland (1519–1524)
Copernicus successfully defended Olsztyn on the head of royal troops
besiged by the troops of Albert of Brandenburg.
In 1533 Albert Widmanstadt delivered a series of lectures in Rome
outlining Copernicus' theory. In 1536 his work was already in a
definitive form, and some rumours about his theory had reached the
scientists of all Europe. From many parts of the continent, Copernicus
received invitations to publish it, but he felt quite apprehensive
of persecution for his revolutionary work by the establishment of
the time. The cardinal Nicola Schonberg of Capua wrote him asking
him to communicate his ideas more widely and requested a copy for
himself; "Therefore, learned man, without wishing to be inopportune,
I beg you most emphatically to communicate your discovery to the
learned world, and to send me as soon as possible your theories
about the Universe, together with the tables and whatever else you
have pertaining to the subject." Some have proposed that this note
may have made Copernicus nervous of publication whereas others have
suggested that the church wanted to ensure that his ideas were published.
Copernicus was still completing his work (even if he was not convinced
to publish it), when in 1539 Georg Joachim Rheticus, a great mathematician
at Wittenberg, directly arrived in Frombork. Philipp Melanchthon
had arranged with several astronomers for Rheticus to visit and
study with them. Rheticus became a disciple of Copernicus' and stayed
with him for two years, in which he wrote a book, Narratio prima,
in which he included the essence of the theory.
In 1542, in the name of Copernicus, Rheticus published a treatise
on trigonometry (later included in the second book of De revolutionibus).
Under the strong pressure from Rheticus, and having seen that the
first general reception of his work had not been favorable, Copernicus
finally agreed to give the book to his close friend Tiedemann Giese,
(the bishop of Chelmno Land), to be delivered to Rheticus for printing
at Nuremberg.
Legend says that the first printed copy of De revolutionibus was
put in Copernicus's hands the same day of his death, so that he
could say goodbye to his opus vitae. He allegedly awoke from his
stroke induced coma, looked at his book, and died peacefully.
Copernicus was buried in the Frombork Cathedral. However, a group
of archaeologists searching for the body of Copernicus in 2004 failed
to find the corpse of the astronomer. They found, however, several
interesting graves from various time periods. The search for the
body of Copernicus will continue in 2005.
The Copernican heliocentric system
Earlier theories
Much has been written about earlier heliocentric theories. Philolaus
(4th century BC) was one of the first to suppose a movement of the
Earth, probably inspired by Pythagoras's theories on a spherical
Globe.
Aristarchus of Samos (3rd century BC) developed some theories
by Heraclides Ponticus (already talking about a revolution of our
planet on its axis) to propose what is, to the best of our knowledge,
the first serious model of a heliocentric solar system. Unfortunately,
his work about his heliocentric hypothesis did not survive, so we
can only speculate about what led him to his conclusions. It is
notable that, according to Plutarch, a contemporary of Aristarchus
accused him of impiety for "putting the Earth in motion".
Copernicus cited Aristarchus and Philolaus in an early manuscript
of his book which has survived, stating: "Philolaus believed in
the mobility of the earth, and some even say that Aristarchus of
Samos was of that opinion." For reasons unknown he crossed out this
passage before publication of his book.
The work of the 14th century Muslim astronomer Ibn al-Shatir contains
results similar to those of Copernicus, and it has even been suggested
that Copernicus might have been influenced by them.
Copernican Theory
Copernicus' major theory was published in the book De revolutionibus
orbium coelestium ("On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres")
in the year of his death 1543, even though he had arrived at it
several decades earlier.
This book marks the beginning of the shift from a geocentric (and
anthropocentric) universe with the Earth at its center. Copernicus
held that the Earth is another planet revolving around the fixed
sun once a year, and turning on its axis once a day. He arrived
at the correct order of the known planets and explained the precession
of the equinoxes correctly by a slow change in the position of the
Earth's rotational axis. He also gave a clear account of the cause
of the seasons: that the Earth's axis is not perpendicular to the
plane of its orbit. He added another motion to the Earth, by which
the axis is kept pointed throughout the year at the same place in
the heavens; from the time of Galileo it has been recognized that
for it not to point to the same place would be a motion.
He also replaced Ptolemy's equant circles with epicycles. This
is the main source of the statement that his system had even more
epicycles than Ptolemy's. With this change his system had only uniform
circular motions, correcting what seemed to be a defect in Ptolemy's
system. Unfortunately, uniform circular motion is not what happens
in the solar system, which runs on elliptical orbits; and this model
was no more precise in predicting ephemerides than the then current
tables based on Ptolemy's model. Furthermore, he badly underestimated
the size of the solar system, like most of the astronomers of the
time.
The system nevertheless had a large influence on scientists such
as Galileo, Tycho Brahe, and Johannes Kepler, who adopted, championed
and (especially in Kepler's case) improved the model. Galileo's
observation of the phases of Venus produced, however, the first
observational evidence for Copernicus' theory.
The Copernican system can be summarized in seven propositions,
as Copernicus himself collected them in a Compendium of De revolutionibus...
that was found and published in 1878:
- Orbits and celestial spheres do not have a unique, common, center.
- The center of the Earth is not the center of the Universe, but
only the center of the Earth's mass and of the lunar orbit.
- All the planets move along orbits whose center is the Sun, therefore
the Sun is the center of the World. (Copernicus was never certain
whether the Sun moved or not, claiming that the center of the
World is 'in the Sun, or near it.')
- The distance between the Earth and the Sun, compared with the
distance between the Earth and the fixed stars, is very small.
- The daytime movement of the Sun is only apparent, and represents
the effect of a rotation that the Earth makes every 24 hours around
its axis, always parallel to itself.
- The Earth (together with its Moon, and just like the other planets)
moves around the Sun, so the movements that the Sun seems making
(its apparent moving during daytime, and its annual moving through
the Zodiac) are nothing else than effects of the Earth's real
movements.
- These movements of the Earth and of the other planets around
the Sun, can explain the stations, and all the particular characteristics
of the planets' movements.
These propositions represent the exact contrary of what the dominant
geocentric propositions stated.
De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium
Main article: De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium.
The work of Copernicus, "On the Revolution of Celestial Spheres"
(1543), dedicated to the Pope Paul III, is divided into 6 books.
The first book contains a general vision of the heliocentric theory,
and a summarized exposition of his idea on the World.
The second book is mainly theoretical and reports the principles
of spherical astronomy and a list of stars (as a basis for the arguments
developed in the following books).
The third book is mainly dedicated to the apparent movements of
the Sun and to related phenomena.
The fourth book contains a similar description of the Moon and
its orbital movements.
The fifth and the sixth books contain the concrete exposition
of the new system.
Copernicus and Copernicanism
Copernicus' theories have an extraordinary relevance in the history
of human knowledge. Many authors suggest that only Euclidean geometry,
Charles Darwin's Evolutionism, or Newton's physics could have a
similar influence on human culture in general and on science in
particular.
Many meanings have been seen in his theory, quite apart from its
scientific value. His work cut across science and religion, dogmatism
and freedom of scientific investigation. His academic standing is
often compared with Galileo Galilei.
When his work was published, it contradicted then accepted religious
dogma: the suggestion being that there is no need for an entity
(God) that from outside could give a soul, a power and a life to
the World and to Human beings when science can explain everything
attributed to Him.
However, Copernicanism also opened a way to immanence, the view
that the divine force, or the divine being, pervades through all
things that exist, which has been developed further in modern philosophy.
Immanentism also leads into subjectivism: the theory that perception
creates reality, and that there is no underlying, true, reality
that exists independent of perception. Accordingly some find that
Copernicanism demolished the foundations of mediaeval science and
metaphysics.
One of the consequences of Copernicanism is that scientific laws
must not necessarily coincide with appearance. This contrasts with
Aristotle's system, which placed much more value on knowledge gained
from the senses.
Copernicus' innovation was a scientific revolution. Some say "the"
revolution Immanuel Kant for instance, caught the symbolic character
of Copernicus' revolution (of which he put in evidence the transcendental
rationalism postulating that human rationality was the real legislator
of observed phenomena. More recent philosophers also have found
Copernicanism to remain valid and retain valuable philosophical
meaning.
Discussion
Copernicus' lived in early 16th century Prussia and Poland, and
was influenced by the cultural, religious, and social contexts of
life at the time. He was well educated. At the University of Krakow,
which he attended in 1491 and 1492, Copernicus studied both mathematics
and astronomy in common with all university students of that time.
There is evidence that his interest in these subjects continued
after he had left Krakow.
The Earth-centered Ptolemaic cosmology had been the accepted model
of the universe since the 2nd century BC. Ptolemy's model explained
each planet's circular motion individually and was the first model
of the universe to explain some of the eccentric behaviour of the
planets. It maintained that all planetary motion, and the motion
of the Moon, the Sun, and the stars was circular, around a stationary
Earth.
An accurate calculation of the astronomical year was important
to a clergyman, like Copernicus, allowing him to forecast properly
the various festivals that comprised the liturgical calendar. The
mathematical confusion that Copernicus said caused him to develop
an alternative to the geocentric model derived from an inadequate
reconciliation of the Aristotelian model and amendments to it by
Ptolemy.
The Ptolemaic geocentric model was complicated and inconsistent
in Copernicus' estimations and observations, including one in 1497
of the star Aldebaran, that did not coincide with predictions made
by Ptolemy. Nor did the Ptolemaic model explain precession. Precession
is the phenomenon by which the Earth's axis "wobbles". This characteristic
of the Earth's movement is apparent only with observation over long
periods of time. In Copernicus' view, Ptolemy's explanation failed
to provide an accurate mathematical description of the universe.
His heliocentric universe theory accomplished this by dispensing
with individual explanations for the motion of each planet, and
replacing them with a description that applied to all the planets,
including the Earth.
Copernicus' mathematical experience engendered in his thought
a desire for a simpler and more elegant model of the universe. He
was acquainted with ideas espoused by other classical authors. Some
of the ideas expressed by Philalaus (5th century BC) and Heraclides
(4th century BC), proposed cosmological models in which the Earth
moved. Aristarchus (3rd century BC) proposed an openly heliocentric
model of the universe. Heraclides' description of the revolutions
of Mercury and Venus around the Sun might have led Copernicus to
consider that the other planets, including the Earth, did the same.
Elegance was a consequence of the overall simplicity of Copernicus'
cosmology and much of this seeming simplicity resulted from his
retention of circular orbits for the planets around the central
Sun. Copernicus used the eccentrics, epicycles, and equants of Ptolemaic
cosmology, but added three kinds of motion to describe the observed
behaviour of the Earth:
- Annual motion — the yearly orbit around the Sun
- Daily rotation — the motion around a tilted axis that results
in day and night
- Precession — the axial wobble mentioned earlier that explains
why the position of the fixed stars seems to change over long
periods of time.
Until 1543, the year that Copernicus died, and the year in which
his de Revolutionibus was published, and for many years afterwards,
Copernicus' description of the motion of the Earth was not ratified
by empirical evidence. In his unauthorized and anonymous preface
to de Revolutionibus, Andreas Osiander was technically correct when
he made reference to "the hypothesis of this work". However, its
consistency with the observed behaviour of the universe in a time
before the telescope made more detailed observation and the gathering
of more accurate measurements practicable, gave the Copernican model
its strongest support. Not much more than a century later, Kepler
had certainly despatched the circular orbits of the planets and
replaced them with ellipses, but the Copernican heliocentric universe
was still intact.
In his own preface to his work, dedicated to Pope Paul III, Copernicus
took care to point out that his motives for developing a cosmology
that included a moving, rather than a stationary, Earth, were inspired
by his dissatisfaction with the mathematical and astronomical descriptions
of the geocentric model, and were not intended to defy the written
Word. "Mathematics", he says, "is written for mathematicians". Copernicus
seems to have been benefited from the attitude of the bishops who
were his superiors in the church - Johann Dantiscus and Tiedmann
Giese. Both preferred, at least initially, to promote tolerance
of differing views within the church rather than open discord, and
both encouraged Copernicus' publication of his scientific beliefs.
However, the lenient attitudes in Chelmno, where Copernicus carried
out much of his work, began to change and might have contributed
to Copernicus' isolation in the last years of his life. For orthodox
Catholics, the Copernican model of the universe might have seemed
too radically different from the geocentric model, sustained as
it was by its agreement with many scriptural references. They might
not have been ready to change to an understanding of the Bible as
a source only of moral and spiritual, rather than scientific, wisdom.
As far as Copernicus was concerned, the Sun, a distinctive element
in classical thought, held the central and most important position
in the universe, gave added credence to his cosmology. His reverence
for the sun can be seen in the most famous passage of de Revolutionibus:
- "In the center of all rests the Sun. For who would place this
lamp of a very beautful temple in another or better place then
this from which it can illuminate everything at the same time?
As a matter of fact, not unhappily do some call it the lantern;
others, the mind, and still others, the pilot of the world. Trismegistus
calls it a 'visible God'; Sophocles' Electra, 'that which gazes
upon all things.' And so the Sun, as if resting on a kingly throne,
governs the family of stars which wheel around."
In this discussion of Copernicus' reasons for discarding such
a long-held belief as the geocentric cosmology of Ptolemy, we can
see that the Copernican revolution was simmering against a background
revolution of theological thought — the Reformation. Neo-Platonic
and classical ideas formed the intellectual environment in which
Copernicus worked. Although not holding ordained office within the
Catholic Church, Copernicus was devout and unwilling to be openly
defiant of the Church's teaching, but, in common with supporters
of the Reformation, Copernicus was criticizing orthodox theory and
belief. His reasons for doing so lay in his dissatisfaction with
the inadequacies of the geocentric model, in his strong belief in
the truth of the solution to the problem that he developed, its
elegance and relative simplicity, and its coincidence with observation
and with the classical ideals to which he had subscribed since his
youth.
Quotes
Goethe:
- "Of all discoveries and opinions, none may have exerted a greater
effect on the human spirit than the doctrine of Copernicus. The
world had scarcely become known as round and complete in itself
when it was asked to waive the tremendous privilege of being the
center of the universe. Never, perhaps, was a greater demand made
on mankind - for by this admission so many things vanished in
mist and smoke! What became of our Eden, our world of innocence,
piety and poetry; the testimony of the senses; the conviction
of a poetic - religious faith? No wonder his contemporaries did
not wish to let all this go and offered every possible resistance
to a doctrine which in its converts authorized and demanded a
freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed
not even dreamed of."
Copernicus:
- For I am not so enamored of my own opinions that I disregard
what others may think of them. I am aware that a philosopher's
ideas are not subject to the judgement of ordinary persons, because
it is his endeavor to seek the truth in all things, to the extent
permitted to human reason by God. Yet I hold that completely erroneous
views should be shunned. Those who know that the consensus of
many centuries has sanctioned the conception that the earth remains
at rest in the middle of the heaven as its center would, I reflected,
regard it as an insane pronouncement if I made the opposite assertion
that the earth moves.
- For when a ship is floating calmly along, the sailors see its
motion mirrored in everything outside, while on the other hand
they suppose that they are stationary, together with everything
on board. In the same way, the motion of the earth can unquestionably
produce the impression that the entire universe is rotating.
- "Therefore alongside the ancient hypotheses, which are no more
probable, let us permit these new hypotheses also to become known,
especially since they are admirable as well as simple and bring
with them a huge treasure of very skillful observations. So far
as hypotheses are concerned, let no one expect anything certain
from astronomy, which cannot furnish it, lest he accept as the
truth ideas conceived for another purpose, and depart from this
study a greater fool than when he entered it. Farewell."
|